No scrapping old cars, please!
Forcing people to junk old vehicles and buy new ones will not reduce pollution
Alok Tiwari
All hell broke loose last week when the
police in Delhi began impounding some vehicles entering fuel pumps for a refill.
Without much notice, the authorities had begun enforcing an old rule that
prohibited running of petrol vehicles older than 15 years and diesel vehicles
older than 10 years in the national capital. Cameras read the numbers of
vehicles and checked with the transport department’s database. As soon as an
older vehicle entered the fuel station, an alarm was raised. In some cases, the
police took the vehicle straight to a scrap station. All the owners got was
scrap value calculated as per specified formula and promise of tax rebate on
the new vehicle they may purchase. In other cases, the vehicles were let off,
but drivers were warned not to ply them on the roads anymore.
This led to immediate panic and protests.
Though the move was a long time coming, it was deemed so impractical that everybody
thought it would never be implemented. Some confined their older vehicles to
home. Some tried to dispose of them in other states where they were still
street legal. Naturally, this led to a crash in secondary market. Even luxury
cars were sold for a pittance. Many questioned the logic of the policy itself.
Some said it was confiscation of private property that the state had no right to
do. Others pointed out that state could not ban vehicles after 10 years when it
has taken road tax for it for 15 years. The authorities eventually realized the
intensity of the protests and put the policy on hold.
This respite, though, is temporary. Nobody
in the government has talked about withdrawing the policy altogether. It is a
Damocles’ sword hanging over the vehicle users in Delhi. Sooner or later, the
policy will be implemented nationwide. Union minister of highways Nitin Gadkari
has often supported the scrappage policy citing pollution caused by older
vehicles. Most states already levy a green tax on older vehicles, renewing their
registration for five years at a time. This additional burden is again meant to
encourage the owners to go in for newer vehicles that are supposedly more fuel
efficient and hence less polluting. The next step will be to ban older vehicles
completely.
Alas, if only it were so simple. Hoping
that trading in older vehicles for newer ones will reduce pollution is akin to
hoping that demonetisation will reduce corruption. What appears appealing at
first glance often misses the complexities of the problem. There are several
reasons why the scrappage policy is pig-headed. For one, it misses the economic
reality of even the relatively well-off in India. Though vehicles ownership,
including cars, has multiplied in last couple of decades and the country is home
to one of the biggest auto industries in the world, owning a vehicle is still a
big deal for most people.
At a time when economic hardships are
forcing people even in rich countries to hold on to their vehicles longer, to
force people to trade in their 10- or 15-year-old vehicles is cruel. There are
many households and small businesses that purchase cheaply available pre-owned
vehicles with the intention of driving them for many more years. This has
spawned a huge repair and maintenance industry. The policy threatens the
existence of army of mechanics in every city who ensure these vehicles keep
running.
The second reason is that upgrading the
vehicle will make only marginal difference, if at all, to air quality. This is
because there has been only incremental improvement in fuel efficiency of
vehicles over the years. This too is negated by two factors. One is overall
increase in number of vehicles. Earlier if there were 100 highly polluting
vehicles in an area, now there are 500 slightly less polluting ones. The air
quality can only get worse. Second factor is that while trading in, most people
upgrade to bigger vehicle. So even if they buy a more fuel efficient one, they
will burn the same or even greater amount of fuel. Even buying an electric
vehicle will have only a limited effect on air quality unless bulk of the
electricity is coming from renewable sources, which is not going to be the case
for many years.
It is widely proven that the least
polluting vehicle is your existing one. Because no matter how great the fuel
efficiency of the new one, it is more than offset by the total carbon footprint
of making of a new one. So, the best policy would be exactly the opposite of
what the government is doing in Delhi and intends to do all over the country.
It must incentivise people to hold on to their vehicle for as long as possible.
At the same time, it must strictly enforce the emission norms. This will ensure
vehicles are maintained in good condition. Action should be taken against
ill-maintained vehicles, not older ones.
There are other things that can be done to
improve air quality in cities without forcing people to spend huge amounts on
new vehicles unnecessarily. First is providing top quality public transport.
This single thing can make a huge difference. Once this is done, use of private
vehicles in crowded and polluted areas of a city can be disincentivized through
high parking charges or even a congestion tax. Restricting purchase of vehicles
to only those who have adequate private parking place, a measure being enacted
in Maharashtra, will also reduce car numbers and congestion.
Forcing people to scrap vehicles in
perfectly good condition is morally and scientifically wrong. As a former
defence officer has pointed out, the government itself is making do with
fighter jets over 40 years old. It is also using tanks that are decades old.
When it makes allowance for its own economic compulsions, it needs to do the
same for the people at large as well.

Comments
Post a Comment